Regulation (EU) 2022/858

as it stood on 2022-05-30, permalink: /eu-eurlex/32022r0858/2022-05-30--d6265db814a2eb4a6dd30ea7cd09dfac7865bbb7086aec7238cb96f595817f6d

Official publisher wording state selected for 2022-05-30. This is the consolidated version dated 2022-05-30. Its interval on Lex's publisher-version axis is publisher version 2022-05-30 → 2022-06-01; that is not a claim about entry into force or application.

Text included, per-article reading view. Deterministic extraction of the verbatim retrieved document; each displayed provision carries its own hash and anchor. © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse permitted with attribution under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU. Consolidated texts have no legal effect; only acts published in the Official Journal are authentic.

Outline, 19 provisions

art_1 art_2 art_3 art_4 art_5 art_6 art_7 art_8 art_9 art_10 art_11 art_12 art_13 art_14 art_15 art_16 art_17 art_18 art_19

art_1 #art_1

Article 1

This Regulation lays down requirements in relation to DLT market infrastructures and their operators in respect of:

(a)	granting and withdrawing specific permissions to operate DLT market infrastructures in accordance with this Regulation;

(b)	granting, modifying and withdrawing exemptions related to specific permissions;

(c)	mandating, modifying and withdrawing the conditions attached to exemptions and in respect of mandating, modifying and withdrawing compensatory or corrective measures;

(d)	operating DLT market infrastructures;

(e)	supervising DLT market infrastructures; and

(f)	cooperation between operators of DLT market infrastructures, competent authorities and the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority) established by Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 (ESMA).

art_2 #art_2

Article 2

For the purposes of this Regulation, the following definitions apply:

(1)	‘distributed ledger technology’ or ‘DLT’ means a technology that enables the operation and use of distributed ledgers;

(2)	‘distributed ledger’ means an information repository that keeps records of transactions and that is shared across, and synchronised between, a set of DLT network nodes using a consensus mechanism;

(3)	‘consensus mechanism’ means the rules and procedures by which an agreement is reached, among DLT network nodes, that a transaction is validated;

(4)	‘DLT network node’ means a device or process that is part of a network and that holds a complete or partial replica of records of all transactions on a distributed ledger;

(5)	‘DLT market infrastructure’ means a DLT multilateral trading facility, a DLT settlement system or a DLT trading and settlement system;

(6)	‘DLT multilateral trading facility’ or ‘DLT MTF’ means a multilateral trading facility that only admits to trading DLT financial instruments;

(7)

‘DLT settlement system’ or ‘DLT SS’ means a settlement system that settles transactions in DLT financial instruments against payment or against delivery, irrespective of whether that settlement system has been designated and notified in accordance with Directive 98/26/EC, and that allows the initial recording of DLT financial instruments or allows the provision of safekeeping services in relation to DLT financial instruments;

(8)	‘settlement’ means settlement as defined in Article 2(1), point (7), of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014;

(9)	‘settlement fail’ means settlement fail as defined in Article 2(1), point (15), of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014;

(10)	‘DLT trading and settlement system’ or ‘DLT TSS’ means a DLT MTF or DLT SS that combines services performed by a DLT MTF and a DLT SS;

(11)	‘DLT financial instrument’ means a financial instrument that is issued, recorded, transferred and stored using distributed ledger technology;

(12)	‘financial instrument’ means a financial instrument as defined in Article 4(1), point (15), of Directive 2014/65/EU;

(13)	‘multilateral trading facility’ means a multilateral trading facility as defined in Article 4(1), point (22), of Directive 2014/65/EU;

(14)	‘central securities depository’ or ‘CSD’ means a central securities depository as defined in Article 2(1), point (1), of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014;

(15)	‘securities settlement system’ means a securities settlement system as defined in Article 2(1), point (10), of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014;

(16)	‘business day’ means business day as defined in Article 2(1), point (14), of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014;

(17)	‘delivery versus payment ’ means delivery versus payment as defined in Article 2(1), point (27), of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014;

(18)	‘credit institution’ means a credit institution as defined in Article 4(1), point (1), of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (17);

(19)	‘investment firm’ means an investment firm as defined in Article 4(1), point (1), of Directive 2014/65/EU;

(20)	‘market operator’ means a market operator as defined in Article 4(1), point (18), of Directive 2014/65/EU;

(21)	‘competent authority’ means one or more competent authorities:(a)designated in accordance with Article 67 of Directive 2014/65/EU;(b)designated in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014; or(c)otherwise designated by a Member State to oversee the application of this Regulation.
(a)	designated in accordance with Article 67 of Directive 2014/65/EU;
(b)	designated in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014; or
(c)	otherwise designated by a Member State to oversee the application of this Regulation.

art_3 #art_3

Article 3

DLT financial instruments shall only be admitted to trading on a DLT market infrastructure, or be recorded on a DLT market infrastructure, if, at the moment of admission to trading or the moment of recording on a distributed ledger, the DLT financial instruments are:

(a)	shares, the issuer of which has a market capitalisation, or a tentative market capitalisation, of less than EUR 500 million;

(b)	bonds, other forms of securitised debt, including depositary receipts in respect of such securities, or money market instruments, with an issue size of less than EUR 1 billion, excluding those that embed a derivative or incorporate a structure which makes it difficult for the client to understand the risk involved; or

(c)	units in collective investment undertakings covered by Article 25(4), point (a)(iv), of Directive 2014/65/EU, the market value of the assets under management of which is less than EUR 500 million.

Corporate bonds issued by issuers whose market capitalisation did not exceed EUR 200 million at the time of their issuance shall be excluded from the calculation of the threshold referred to in the first subparagraph, point (b).

The aggregate market value of all the DLT financial instruments that are admitted to trading on a DLT market infrastructure or that are recorded on a DLT market infrastructure shall not exceed EUR 6 billion at the moment of admission to trading, or initial recording, of a new DLT financial instrument.

Where the admission to trading or initial recording of a new DLT financial instrument would result in the aggregate market value referred to in the first subparagraph reaching EUR 6 billion, the DLT market infrastructure shall not admit that DLT financial instrument to trading or record it.

Where the aggregate market value of all the DLT financial instruments that are admitted to trading on a DLT market infrastructure or that are recorded on a DLT market infrastructure has reached EUR 9 billion, the operator of the DLT market infrastructure shall activate the transition strategy referred to in Article 7(7). The operator of the DLT market infrastructure shall notify the competent authority of the activation of its transition strategy and of the timescale for the transition in the monthly report provided for in paragraph 5.
The operator of a DLT market infrastructure shall calculate the monthly average aggregate market value of DLT financial instruments traded or recorded on that DLT market infrastructure. That monthly average shall be calculated as the average of the daily closing prices of each DLT financial instrument, multiplied by the number of DLT financial instruments that are traded or recorded on that DLT market infrastructure with the same International Securities Identification Number (ISIN).

The operator of the DLT market infrastructure shall use that monthly average:

(a)	when assessing whether the admission to trading or recording of a new DLT financial instrument in the following month would result in the aggregate market value of DLT financial instruments reaching the threshold referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article; and

(b)	when deciding whether to activate the transition strategy referred to in Article 7(7).

The operator of a DLT market infrastructure shall submit monthly reports to its competent authority demonstrating that all DLT financial instruments that are admitted to trading or recorded on the DLT market infrastructure do not exceed the thresholds set out in paragraphs 2 and 3.
A competent authority may set lower thresholds than the values set out in paragraphs 1 and 2. If a competent authority lowers the threshold referred to in paragraph 2, the value set out in paragraph 3 shall be deemed to be commensurately lowered.

For the purposes of the first subparagraph of this paragraph, the competent authority shall consider the market size and the average capitalisation of DLT financial instruments of a given type that have been admitted to trading platforms in the Member States where the services and activities will be carried out and shall consider the risks that relate to the issuers, to the type of distributed ledger technology used and to the services and activities of the DLT market infrastructure.

Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 applies to DLT financial instruments admitted to trading on a DLT MTF or on a DLT TSS.

art_4 #art_4

Article 4

A DLT MTF shall be subject to the requirements that apply to a multilateral trading facility under Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 and Directive 2014/65/EU.

The first subparagraph does not apply in respect of those requirements from which the investment firm or market operator operating the DLT MTF has been exempted under paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article, provided that that investment firm or market operator complies with:

(a)	Article 7;

(b)	paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 of this Article; and

(c)	any compensatory measures that the competent authority deems appropriate in order to meet the objectives of the provisions in respect of which an exemption has been requested or in order to ensure investor protection, market integrity or financial stability.

In addition to the persons specified in Article 53(3) of Directive 2014/65/EU, if requested by an operator of a DLT MTF, the competent authority may permit that operator to admit natural and legal persons to deal on own account as members or participants, provided that such persons fulfil the following requirements:

(a)	they are of sufficient good repute;

(b)	they have a sufficient level of trading ability, competence and experience, including knowledge of the functioning of distributed ledger technology;

(c)	they are not market makers on the DLT MTF;

(d)	they do not use a high-frequency algorithmic trading technique on the DLT MTF;

(e)	they do not provide other persons with direct electronic access to the DLT MTF;

(f)	they do not deal on their own account when executing client orders on the DLT market infrastructure; and

(g)	they have given informed consent to trading on the DLT MTF as members or participants and have been informed by the DLT MTF of the potential risks of using its systems to trade DLT financial instruments.

Where the competent authority grants the exemption referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph, it may require additional measures for the protection of natural persons admitted to the DLT MTF as members or participants. Such measures shall be proportionate to the risk profile of those members or participants.

At the request of an operator of a DLT MTF, the competent authority may exempt that operator or its members or participants from Article 26 of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014.

Where the competent authority grants an exemption as referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph, the DLT MTF shall keep records of all transactions executed through its systems. Those records shall contain all the details specified in Article 26(3) of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 that are relevant, having regard to the system used by the DLT MTF and the member or participant executing the transaction. The DLT MTF shall also ensure that the competent authorities entitled to receive the data directly from the multilateral trading facility in accordance with Article 26 of that Regulation have direct and immediate access to those details. In order to access those records, such competent authority shall be admitted to the DLT MTF as a regulatory observer participant.

The competent authority shall make available any information it has accessed in accordance with this Article to ESMA without undue delay.

Where an operator of a DLT MTF requests an exemption under paragraph 2 or 3, it shall demonstrate that the exemption requested is:

(a)	proportionate to, and justified by, the use of distributed ledger technology; and

(b)	limited to the DLT MTF and does not extend to any other multilateral trading facility operated by that operator.

Paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 of this Article apply, mutatis mutandis, to a CSD operating a DLT TSS in accordance with Article 6(2).
ESMA shall prepare guidelines on the compensatory measures referred to in paragraph 1, second subparagraph, point (c).

art_5 #art_5

Article 5

A CSD operating a DLT SS shall be subject to the requirements that apply to a CSD operating a securities settlement system under Regulation (EU) No 909/2014.

The first subparagraph does not apply in respect of those requirements from which the CSD operating the DLT SShas been exempted under paragraphs 2 to 9 of this Article, provided that that CSD complies with:

(a)	Article 7;

(b)	paragraphs 2 to 10 of this Article; and

(c)	any compensatory measures that the competent authority deems appropriate in order to meet the objectives of the provisions in respect of which an exemption has been requested or in order to ensure investor protection, market integrity or financial stability.

At the request of a CSD operating a DLT SS, the competent authority may exempt that CSD from Article 2(1), points (4), (9) or (28), or Article 3, 37 or 38 of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, provided that that CSD:

(a)	demonstrates that the use of a ‘securities account’ as defined in Article 2(1), point (28), of that Regulation or the use of the book-entry form as provided for in Article 3 of that Regulation is incompatible with the use of the particular distributed ledger technology;

(b)	proposes compensatory measures to meet the objectives of the provisions in respect of which an exemption has been requested, and ensures at a minimum that:(i)the DLT financial instruments are recorded on the distributed ledger;(ii)the number of DLT financial instruments in an issue or in part of an issue recorded by the CSD operating the DLT SS is equal to the total number of DLT financial instruments making up such issue or part of an issue that are recorded on the distributed ledger at any given time;(iii)it keeps records that enable the CSD operating the DLT SS at any given time to segregate the DLT financial instruments of a member, participant, issuer or client from those of any other member, participant, issuer or client without delay; and(iv)it does not allow securities overdrafts, debit balances or the improper creation or deletion of securities.
(i)	the DLT financial instruments are recorded on the distributed ledger;
(ii)	the number of DLT financial instruments in an issue or in part of an issue recorded by the CSD operating the DLT SS is equal to the total number of DLT financial instruments making up such issue or part of an issue that are recorded on the distributed ledger at any given time;
(iii)	it keeps records that enable the CSD operating the DLT SS at any given time to segregate the DLT financial instruments of a member, participant, issuer or client from those of any other member, participant, issuer or client without delay; and
(iv)	it does not allow securities overdrafts, debit balances or the improper creation or deletion of securities.

At the request of a CSD operating DLT SS, the competent authority may exempt that CSD from Article 6 or 7 of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 provided that that CSD ensures, at a minimum, by means of robust procedures and arrangements, that the DLT SS:

(a)	enables clear, accurate and timely confirmation of the details of transactions in DLT financial instruments, including any payments made in respect of DLT financial instruments, as well as the discharge of any collateral in respect of those instruments or calls for collateral in respect of DLT financial instruments; and

(b)	either prevents settlement fails or addresses settlement fails if it is not possible to prevent them.

At the request of a CSD operating a DLT SS, the competent authority may exempt that CSD from Article 19 of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 in relation only to the outsourcing of a core service to a third party, provided that the application of that Article is incompatible with the use of distributed ledger technology as envisaged by the DLT SS operated by that CSD.
At the request of a CSD operating a DLT SS, the competent authority may permit that CSD to admit natural and legal persons in addition to those listed in Article 2, point (f), of Directive 98/26/EC as participants in the DLT SS, provided that such persons:

(a)	are of sufficient good repute;

(b)	have a sufficient level of ability, competence, experience and knowledge in relation to settlement, the functioning of distributed ledger technology, and risk assessment; and

(c)	have given informed consent to be included in the pilot regime provided for in this Regulation and are adequately informed of its experimental nature and the potential risks associated with it.

At the request of a CSD operating a DLT SS, the competent authority may exempt that CSD from Article 33, 34 or 35 of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, provided that that CSD proposes compensatory measures to meet the objectives of those Articles and, at a minimum, ensures that:

(a)	the DLT SS publicly discloses criteria for participation that allow fair and open access for all persons that intend to become participants, and that those criteria are transparent, objective, and non-discriminatory; and

(b)	the DLT SS publicly discloses prices and fees associated with the settlement services that it provides.

At the request of a CSD operating a DLT SS, the competent authority may exempt that CSD from Article 39 of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, provided that that CSD proposes compensatory measures to meet the objectives of that Article, and ensures at a minimum, by means of robust procedures and arrangements, that:

(a)	the DLT SS settles transactions in DLT financial instruments at close to real time or intraday and in any case no later than on the second business day after the conclusion of the trade;

(b)	the DLT SS publicly discloses the rules governing the settlement system; and

(c)	the DLT SS mitigates any risk arising from the non-designation of the DLT SS as a system for the purposes of Directive 98/26/EC, in particular with regard to insolvency proceedings.

For the purposes of operating a DLT SS, the definition of a CSD in Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 as a legal person who operates a securities settlement system shall not result in Member States being required to designate and notify a DLT SS as a securities settlement system under Directive 98/26/EC. However, Member States shall not be precluded from designating and notifying a DLT SS as a securities settlement system under Directive 98/26/EC where the DLT SS fulfils the requirements of that Directive.

Where a DLT SS is not designated and notified as a securities settlement system under Directive 98/26/EC, the CSD operating that DLT SS shall propose compensatory measures to mitigate risks arising from insolvency.

At the request of a CSD operating a DLT SS, the competent authority may exempt that CSD from Article 40 of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, provided that that CSD settles on the basis of delivery versus payment.

The settlement of payments shall be carried out through central bank money, including in tokenised form, where practical and available or, where not practical and available, through the account of the CSD in accordance with Title IV of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 or through commercial bank money, including in tokenised form, in accordance with that Title, or using ‘e-money tokens’.

By way of derogation from the second subparagraph of this paragraph, Title IV of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 does not apply to a credit institution when it provides the settlement of payments using commercial bank money to a DLT market infrastructure that records DLT financial instruments whose aggregate market value, at the time of the initial recording of a new DLT financial instrument, does not exceed EUR 6 billion, as calculated in accordance with Article 3(4) of this Regulation.

Where the settlement occurs using commercial bank money provided by a credit institution to which Title IV of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 does not apply by virtue of the third subparagraph of this paragraph, or where the settlement of payments occurs using ‘e-money tokens’, the CSD operating the DLT SS shall identify, measure, monitor, manage, and minimise any risks arising from the use of such means.

Services related to ‘e-money tokens’ that are equivalent to the services listed in Section C, points (b) and (c), of the Annex to Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 shall be provided by the CSD operating the DLT SS in accordance with Title IV of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 or by a credit institution.

At the request of a CSD operating a DLT SS, the competent authority may exempt that CSD from Article 50, 51 or 53 of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, provided that that CSD demonstrates that the use of distributed ledger technology is incompatible with legacy systems of other CSDs or other market infrastructures or that granting access to another CSD or access to another market infrastructure using legacy systems would trigger disproportionate costs, given the scale of the activities of the DLT SS.

Where a CSD operating a DLT SS has been exempted in accordance with the first subparagraph of this paragraph, it shall give other operators of DLT SSs or other operators of DLT TSSs access to its DLT SS. The CSD operating the DLT SS shall inform the competent authority of its intention to give such access. The competent authority may prohibit such access to the extent that such access would be detrimental to the stability of the Union financial system, or the financial system of the Member State concerned.

Where a CSD operating a DLT SS requests an exemption under paragraphs 2 to 9, it shall demonstrate that the exemption requested is:

(a)	proportionate to, and justified by, the use of distributed ledger technology; and

(b)	limited to the DLT SS and does not extend to a securities settlement system that is operated by the same CSD.

Paragraphs 2 to 10 of this Article apply, mutatis mutandis, to an investment firm or market operator operating a DLT TSS in accordance with Article 6(1).
ESMA shall prepare guidelines on the compensatory measures referred to in paragraph 1, second subparagraph, point (c), of this Article.

art_6 #art_6

Article 6

An investment firm or market operator operating a DLT TSS shall be subject to:

(a)	the requirements that apply to a multilateral trading facility under Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 and Directive 2014/65/EU; and

(b)	mutatis mutandis, the requirements that apply to a CSD under Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, with the exception of Articles 9, 16, 17, 18, 20, 26, 27, 28, 31, 42, 43, 44, 46 and 47 of that Regulation.

The first subparagraph does not apply in respect of those requirements from which the investment firm or market operator operating the DLT TSS has been exempted under Article 4(2) and (3) and Article 5(2) to (9), provided that that investment firm or market operator complies with:

(a)	Article 7;

(b)	Article 4(2), (3) and (4) and Article 5(2) to (10); and

(c)	any compensatory measures that the competent authority deems appropriate in order to meet the objectives of the provisions in respect of which an exemption has been requested, or in order to ensure investor protection, market integrity or financial stability.

A CSD operating a DLT TSS shall be subject to:

(a)	the requirements that apply to a CSD under Regulation (EU) No 909/2014; and

(b)	mutatis mutandis, the requirements that apply to a multilateral trading facility under Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 and Directive 2014/65/EU, with the exception of Articles 5 to 13 of that Directive.

The first subparagraph does not apply in respect of those requirements from which the CSD operating the DLT TSS has been exempted under Article 4(2) and (3) and Article 5(2) to (9), provided that that CSD complies with:

(a)	Article 7;

(b)	Article 4(2), (3) and (4) and Article 5(2) to (10); and

(c)	any compensatory measures that the competent authority deems appropriate in order to meet the objectives of the provisions in respect of which an exemption has been requested or in order to ensure investor protection, market integrity or financial stability.

art_7 #art_7

Article 7

Operators of DLT market infrastructures shall establish clear and detailed business plans describing how they intend to carry out their services and activities, which shall include a description of their critical staff, the technical aspects and use of the distributed ledger technology, and the information required under paragraph 3.

Operators of DLT market infrastructures shall also make publicly available up-to-date, clear and detailed written documentation that defines the rules under which the DLT market infrastructures and their operators are to operate, including the legal terms defining the rights, obligations, responsibilities and liabilities of operators of DLT market infrastructures, as well as those of the members, participants, issuers and clients using their DLT market infrastructure. Such legal terms shall specify the governing law, any pre-litigation dispute settlement mechanisms, any insolvency protection measures under Directive 98/26/EC and the jurisdictions in which legal action may be brought. Operators of DLT market infrastructures may make their written documentation available by electronic means.

Operators of DLT market infrastructures shall establish or document, as appropriate, rules on the functioning of the distributed ledger technology they use, including rules on accessing the distributed ledger, on the participation of the validating nodes, on addressing potential conflicts of interests, and on risk management including any mitigation measures to ensure investor protection, market integrity and financial stability.
Operators of DLT market infrastructures shall provide their members, participants, issuers and clients with clear and unambiguous information on their website regarding how the operators carry out their functions, services and activities and how their performance of those functions, services and activities deviates from those performed by a multilateral trading facility or securities settlement system that is not based on distributed ledger technology. That information shall include the type of distributed ledger technology used.
Operators of DLT market infrastructures shall ensure that the overall IT and cyber arrangements related to the use of their distributed ledger technology are proportionate to the nature, scale and complexity of their businesses. Those arrangements shall ensure the continuity and continued transparency, availability, reliability and security of their services and activities, including the reliability of smart contracts used on the DLT market infrastructure. Those arrangements shall also ensure the integrity, security and confidentiality of any data stored by those operators, and shall ensure that those data are available and accessible.

Operators of DLT market infrastructures shall have in place specific operational risk management procedures for the risks posed by the use of distributed ledger technology and crypto-assets and for how to address those risks if they materialise.

To assess the reliability of the overall IT and cyber arrangements of a DLT market infrastructure, the competent authority may require an audit of those arrangements. If the competent authority requires an audit, it shall appoint an independent auditor to carry it out. The DLT market infrastructure shall bear the costs of the audit.

Where an operator of a DLT market infrastructure ensures the safekeeping of members’, participants’, issuers’ or clients’ funds, collateral or DLT financial instruments and ensures the means of access to such assets, including in the form of cryptographic keys, that operator shall have adequate arrangements in place to prevent the use of those assets on the operator’s own account without the prior express written consent of the member, participant, issuer, or client concerned, which may be made through electronic means.

Operators of DLT market infrastructure shall maintain safe, accurate, reliable and retrievable records of the funds, collateral and DLT financial instruments held by their DLT market infrastructure for their members, participants, issuers or clients, as well as of the means of access to those funds, collateral and DLT financial instruments.

Operators of DLT market infrastructure shall segregate the funds, collateral and DLT financial instruments of the members, participants, issuers or clients using the DLT market infrastructure, and the means of access to such assets, from those of the operator as well as from those of other members, participants, issuers and clients.

The overall IT and cyber arrangements referred to in paragraph 4 shall ensure that those funds, collateral and DLT financial instruments held by a DLT market infrastructure for its members, participants, issuers or clients, as well as the means of access to them, are protected from the risks of unauthorised access, hacking, degradation, loss, cyber-attack, theft, fraud, negligence and other serious operational malfunctions.

In the event of a loss of funds, a loss of collateral or a loss of a DLT financial instrument, the operator of a DLT market infrastructure that lost the funds, collateral or DLT financial instrument shall be liable for the loss, up to the market value of the asset lost. The operator of the DLT market infrastructure shall not be liable for the loss where it proves that the loss arose as a result of an external event beyond its reasonable control, the consequences of which were unavoidable despite all reasonable efforts to the contrary.

Operators of DLT market infrastructure shall establish transparent and adequate arrangements to ensure investor protection, and shall establish mechanisms for handling client complaints and procedures for compensation or redress in cases of investor loss as a result of any of the circumstances referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph or as a result of the cessation of the business due to any of the circumstances referred to in Articles 8(13), 9(11) and 10(10).

A competent authority may decide, on a case-by-case basis, to require additional prudential safeguards from the operator of a DLT market infrastructure in the form of own funds or an insurance policy if the competent authority determines that potential liabilities for damages to clients of the operator of the DLT market infrastructure as a result of any of the circumstances referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph are not adequately covered by the prudential requirements provided for in Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, Regulation (EU) 2019/2033 of the European Parliament and of the Council (18), Directive 2014/65/EU or Directive (EU) 2019/2034 of the European Parliament and of the Council (19), in order to ensure investor protection.

An operator of a DLT market infrastructure shall establish and make publicly available a clear and detailed strategy for reducing the activity of a particular DLT market infrastructure or for transitioning out of, or ceasing to operate, a particular DLT market infrastructure (‘transition strategy’), including the transition or reversion of its distributed ledger technology operations to traditional market infrastructures, in the event:

(a)	that the threshold referred to in Article 3(3) has been exceeded;

(b)	that a specific permission or exemption granted under this Regulation is to be withdrawn or otherwise discontinued, including where the specific permission or exemption is discontinued as a consequence of the events envisaged under Article 14(2); or

(c)	of any voluntary or involuntary cessation of the business of the DLT market infrastructure.

The transition strategy shall be ready to be deployed in a timely manner.

The transition strategy shall set out how members, participants, issuers and clients are to be treated in the event of a withdrawal or discontinuation of a specific permission or the cessation of the business as referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph. The transition strategy shall set out how clients, in particular retail investors, are to be protected from any disproportionate impact from the withdrawal or discontinuation of a specific permission or the cessation of the business. The transition strategy shall be updated on an ongoing basis subject to the prior approval of the competent authority.

The transition strategy shall specify what is to be done in the event that the threshold referred to in Article 3(3) is exceeded.

Investment firms or market operators that are only permitted to operate a DLT MTF under Article 8(2) of this Regulation and that do not indicate in their transition strategies that they intend to obtain an authorisation to operate a multilateral trading facility under Directive 2014/65/EU, as well as CSDs operating a DLT TSS, shall use best efforts to conclude arrangements with investment firms or market operators operating a multilateral trading facility under Directive 2014/65/EU to take over their operations, and shall specify those arrangements in their transition strategies.
CSDs operating a DLT SS that are only permitted to operate a DLT SS under Article 9(2) of this Regulation and that do not indicate in their transition strategies that they intend to obtain an authorisation to operate a securities settlement system under Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, and investment firms or market operators operating a DLT TSS, shall use best efforts to conclude arrangements with CSDs operating a securities settlement system to take over their operations, and shall specify those arrangements in their transition strategies.

CSDs operating a securities settlement system that receive a request to conclude the arrangements referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph shall respond within three months of the date of receipt of the request. The CSD operating the securities settlement system shall conclude the arrangements in a non-discriminatory manner and may charge a reasonable commercial fee based on actual costs. It shall deny such a request only where it considers that the arrangements would affect the smooth and orderly functioning of the financial markets or would pose a systemic risk. It shall not deny a request on the grounds of loss of market share. If it denies a request, it shall inform the operator of the DLT market infrastructure that made the request of its reasons in writing.

The arrangements referred to in paragraphs 8 and 9 shall be in place no later than five years from the date of granting of the specific permission, or shall be in place at an earlier date if required by the competent authority in order to address any risk of early termination of the specific permission.

art_8 #art_8

Article 8

A legal person who is authorised as an investment firm, or authorised to operate a regulated market, under Directive 2014/65/EU may apply for a specific permission to operate a DLT MTF under this Regulation.
Where a legal person applies for authorisation as an investment firm or for authorisation to operate a regulated market under Directive 2014/65/EU and, simultaneously, applies for a specific permission under this Article, for the sole purpose of operating a DLT MTF, the competent authority shall not assess whether the applicant fulfils the requirements of Directive 2014/65/EU in respect of which the applicant has requested an exemption in accordance with Article 4 of this Regulation.
Where, as referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article, a legal person simultaneously applies for authorisation as an investment firm, or for authorisation to operate a regulated market, and for a specific permission, it shall submit in its application the information required under Article 7 of Directive 2014/65/EU, except for information that would be necessary to demonstrate compliance with the requirements in respect of which the applicant has requested an exemption in accordance with Article 4 of this Regulation.
An application for a specific permission to operate a DLT MTF under this Regulation shall contain the following information:

(a)	the applicant’s business plan, the rules of the DLT MTF and any legal terms as referred to in Article 7(1), as well as information regarding the functioning, services and activities of the DLT MTF as referred to in Article 7(3);

(b)	a description of the functioning of the distributed ledger technology used, as referred to in Article 7(2);

(c)	a description of the applicant’s overall IT and cyber arrangements as referred to in Article 7(4);

(d)	evidence that the applicant has in place sufficient prudential safeguards to meet its liabilities and to compensate its clients, as referred to in Article 7(6), third subparagraph;

(e)	where applicable, a description of the safekeeping arrangements for clients’ DLT financial instruments as referred to in Article 7(5);

(f)	a description of the arrangements for ensuring investor protection and a description of the mechanisms for handling client complaints and redress, as referred to in Article 7(6), second subparagraph;

(g)	the applicant’s transition strategy; and

(h)	the exemptions that the applicant is requesting under Article 4, the justification for each exemption requested and any compensatory measures proposed and the means by which it intends to comply with the conditions attached to those exemptions.

By 23 March 2023, ESMA shall develop guidelines to establish standard forms, formats and templates for the purposes of paragraph 4.
Within 30 working days of the date of receipt of an application for a specific permission to operate a DLT MTF, the competent authority shall assess whether the application is complete. If the application is not complete, the competent authority shall set a time limit by which the applicant is to provide the missing or any additional information. The competent authority shall inform the applicant when the competent authority considers the application to be complete.

As soon as the competent authority considers the application to be complete, it shall send a copy of that application to ESMA.

Where necessary to promote the consistency and proportionality of exemptions, or where necessary to ensure investor protection, market integrity and financial stability, ESMA shall provide the competent authority with a non-binding opinion on the exemptions requested or on the adequacy of the type of distributed ledger technology used for the purposes of this Regulation, within 30 calendar days of receiving the copy of that application.

Before issuing a non-binding opinion, ESMA shall consult the competent authorities of the other Member States and shall take the utmost account of their views when issuing its opinion.

Where ESMA issues a non-binding opinion, the competent authority shall give that opinion due consideration and shall provide ESMA with a statement regarding any significant deviations from that opinion if ESMA so requests. ESMA’s opinion and the competent authority’s statement shall not be made public.

By 24 March 2025, ESMA shall develop guidelines to promote the consistency and proportionality of:

(a)	exemptions granted to operators of DLT MTFs throughout the Union, including in the context of evaluating the adequacy of different types of distributed ledger technology used by operators of DLT MTFs for the purposes of this Regulation; and

(b)	the exercise of the option provided for in Article 3(6).

Those guidelines shall ensure investor protection, market integrity and financial stability.

ESMA shall periodically update those guidelines.

Within 90 working days of the date of receipt of a complete application for a specific permission to operate a DLT MTF, the competent authority shall carry out an assessment of the application and decide whether to grant the specific permission. Where an applicant applies simultaneously for authorisation under Directive 2014/65/EU and for a specific permission under this Regulation, the assessment period may be extended for a further period up to that specified in Article 7(3) of Directive 2014/65/EU.
Without prejudice to Articles 7 and 44 of Directive 2014/65/EU, the competent authority shall refuse to grant a specific permission to operate a DLT MTF if there are grounds for believing that:

(a)	there are significant risks to investor protection, market integrity or financial stability that are not properly addressed and mitigated by the applicant;

(b)	the specific permission to operate a DLT MTF and the exemptions requested are being sought for the purpose of circumventing legal or regulatory requirements; or

(c)	the operator of the DLT MTF will not be able to comply, or will not allow its users to comply, with applicable provisions of Union law or provisions of national law falling outside the scope of Union law.

A specific permission shall be valid throughout the Union for a period of up to six years from the date of issuance. The specific permission shall specify the exemptions that are granted in accordance with Article 4, any compensatory measures and any lower thresholds set by the competent authority in accordance with Article 3(6).

The competent authority shall inform ESMA of the grant, refusal or withdrawal of a specific permission under this Article without delay, including any information specified under the first subparagraph of this paragraph.

ESMA shall publish on its website:

(a)	the list of DLT MTFs, the start and end dates of their specific permissions, the list of exemptions granted to each of them, and any lower thresholds set by competent authorities for each of them; and

(b)	the total number of requests for exemptions that have been made under Article 4, indicating the number and types of exemptions granted or refused, together with the justifications for any refusals.

The information referred to in the third subparagraph, point (b), shall be published on an anonymous basis.

Without prejudice to Articles 8 and 44 of Directive 2014/65/EU, the competent authority shall withdraw a specific permission or any related exemptions where:

(a)	a flaw has been discovered in the functioning of the distributed ledger technology used, or in the services and activities provided by the operator of the DLT MTF, that poses a risk to investor protection, market integrity or financial stability, and the risk outweighs the benefits of the services and activities under experimentation;

(b)	the operator of the DLT MTF has breached the conditions attached to the exemptions;

(c)	the operator of the DLT MTF has admitted to trading financial instruments that do not fulfil the conditions set out in Article 3(1);

(d)	the operator of the DLT MTF has exceeded the threshold referred to in Article 3(2);

(e)	the operator of the DLT MTF has exceeded the threshold referred to in Article 3(3) and has not activated the transition strategy; or

(f)	the operator of the DLT MTF obtained the specific permission or related exemptions on the basis of misleading information or a material omission.

Where an operator of a DLT MTF intends to introduce a material change to the functioning of the distributed ledger technology used, or to the services or activities of that operator, and that material change requires a new specific permission, a new exemption, or the modification of one or more of the operator’s existing exemptions or of any conditions attached to an exemption, the operator of the DLT MTF shall request a new specific permission, exemption or modification.

Where an operator of a DLT MTF requests a new specific permission, exemption or modification, the procedure set out in Article 4 shall apply. That request shall be processed by the competent authority in accordance with this Article.

art_9 #art_9

Article 9

A legal person who is authorised as a CSD under Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 may apply for a specific permission to operate a DLT SS under this Regulation.
Where a legal person applies for authorisation as a CSD under Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 and simultaneously applies for a specific permission under this Article, for the sole purpose of operating a DLT SS, the competent authority shall not assess whether the applicant fulfils those requirements of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 in respect of which the applicant has requested an exemption in accordance with Article 5 of this Regulation.
Where, as referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article, a legal person simultaneously applies for authorisation as a CSD and for a specific permission, it shall submit in its application the information referred to in Article 17(2) of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, except for information that would be necessary to demonstrate compliance with the requirements in respect of which the applicant has requested an exemption in accordance with Article 5 of this Regulation.
An application for a specific permission to operate a DLT SS under this Regulation shall contain the following information:

(a)	the applicant’s business plan, the rules of the DLT SS and any legal terms as referred to in Article 7(1), as well as information regarding the functioning, services and activities of the DLT SS as referred to in Article 7(3);

(b)	a description of the functioning of the distributed ledger technology used, as referred to in Article 7(2);

(c)	a description of the applicant’s overall IT and cyber arrangements as referred to in Article 7(4);

(d)	evidence that the applicant has in place sufficient prudential safeguards to meet its liabilities and to compensate its clients, as referred to in Article 7(6), third subparagraph;

(e)	where applicable, a description of the safekeeping arrangements for clients’ DLT financial instruments as referred Article 7(5);

(f)	a description of the arrangements for ensuring investor protection and a description of the mechanisms for handling client complaints and redress, as referred to in Article 7(6), second subparagraph;

(g)	the applicant’s transition strategy; and

(h)	the exemptions that the applicant is requesting under Article 5, the justification for each exemption requested and any compensatory measures proposed and the means by which it intends to comply with the conditions attached to those exemptions.

By 23 March 2023, ESMA shall develop guidelines to establish standard forms, formats and templates for the purposes of paragraph 4.
Within 30 working days of the date of receipt of an application for a specific permission to operate a DLT SS, the competent authority shall assess whether the application is complete. If the application is not complete, the competent authority shall set a time limit by which the applicant is to provide the missing or any additional information. The competent authority shall inform the applicant when the competent authority considers the application to be complete.

As soon as the competent authority considers the application to be complete, it shall send a copy of that application to:

(a)	ESMA; and

(b)	the relevant authorities specified in Article 12 of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014.

Where necessary to promote the consistency and proportionality of exemptions, or where necessary to ensure investor protection, market integrity and financial stability, ESMA shall provide the competent authority with a non-binding opinion on the exemptions requested or on the adequacy of the type of distributed ledger technology used for the purposes of this Regulation, within 30 calendar days of receiving a copy of that application.

Before issuing a non-binding opinion, ESMA shall consult the competent authorities of the other Member States and shall take the utmost account of their views when issuing its opinion.

The relevant authorities specified in Article 12 of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 shall provide the competent authority with a non-binding opinion on the features of the DLT SS operated by the applicant within 30 calendar days of receiving a copy of that application.

By 24 March 2025, ESMA shall develop guidelines to promote the consistency and proportionality of:

(a)	exemptions granted to CSDs operating DLT SSs throughout the Union, including in the context of evaluating the adequacy of different types of distributed ledger technology used by market operators for the purposes of this Regulation; and

(b)	the exercise of the option provided for in Article 3(6).

Those guidelines shall ensure investor protection, market integrity and financial stability.

ESMA shall periodically update those guidelines.

Within 90 working days of the date of receipt of a complete application for a specific permission to operate a DLT SS, the competent authority shall carry out an assessment of the application and decide whether to grant the specific permission. Where the applicant applies simultaneously for authorisation as a CSD under Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 and for a specific permission under this Regulation, the assessment period may be extended for a further period up to that specified in Article 17(8) of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014.
Without prejudice to Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, the competent authority shall refuse to grant a specific permission to operate a DLT SS if there are grounds for believing that:

(a)	there are significant risks to investor protection, market integrity or financial stability that are not properly addressed and mitigated by the applicant;

(b)	the specific permission to operate a DLT SS and the exemptions requested are being sought for the purpose of circumventing legal or regulatory requirements; or

(c)	the CSD will not be able to comply, or will not allow its users to comply, with applicable provisions of Union law or provisions of national law falling outside the scope of Union law.

A specific permission shall be valid throughout the Union for a period of up to six years from the date of issuance. The specific permission shall specify the exemptions that are granted in accordance with Article 5, any compensatory measures and any lower thresholds set by the competent authority in accordance with Article 3(6).

The competent authority shall inform ESMA and the relevant authorities specified in paragraph 7 of this Article of the grant, refusal or withdrawal of a specific permission under this Article without delay, including any information specified under the first subparagraph of this paragraph.

ESMA shall publish on its website:

(a)	the list of DLT SSs, the start and end dates of their specific permissions, the list of exemptions granted to each of them, and any lower thresholds set by the competent authorities for each of them; and

(b)	the total number of requests for exemptions that have been made under Article 5, indicating the number and types of exemptions granted or refused, together with the justifications for any refusals.

The information referred to in the third subparagraph, point (b), shall be published on an anonymous basis.

Without prejudice to Article 20 of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, the competent authority shall withdraw a specific permission or any related exemptions where:

(a)	a flaw has been discovered in the functioning of the distributed ledger technology used, or in the services and activities provided by the CSD operating the DLT SS, that poses a risk to investor protection, market integrity or financial stability, and the risk outweighs the benefits of the services and activities under experimentation;

(b)	the CSD operating the DLT SS has breached the conditions attached to the exemptions;

(c)	the CSD operating the DLT SS has recorded financial instruments that do not fulfil the conditions set out in Article 3(1);

(d)	the CSD operating the DLT SS has exceeded the threshold referred to in Article 3(2);

(e)	the CSD operating the DLT SS has exceeded the threshold referred to in Article 3(3) and has not activated the transition strategy; or

(f)	the CSD operating the DLT SS obtained the specific permission or related exemptions on the basis of misleading information or a material omission.

Where a CSD operating a DLT SS intends to introduce a material change to the functioning of the distributed ledger technology used, or to the services or activities of that CSD, and that material change requires a new specific permission, a new exemption, or the modification of one or more of that CSD’s existing exemptions or of any conditions attached to an exemption, the CSD operating the DLT SS shall request a new specific permission, exemption or modification.

Where a CSD operating a DLT SS requests a new specific permission, exemption or modification, the procedure set out in Article 5 shall apply. That request shall be processed by the competent authority in accordance with this Article.

art_10 #art_10

Article 10

A legal person who is authorised as an investment firm, or authorised to operate a regulated market, under Directive 2014/65/EU, or authorised as a CSD under Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, may apply for a specific permission to operate a DLT TSS under this Regulation.
Where a legal person applies for authorisation as an investment firm or for authorisation to operate a regulated market under Directive 2014/65/EU, or as a CSD under Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, and, simultaneously, applies for a specific permission under this Article, for the sole purpose of operating a DLT TSS, the competent authority shall not assess whether the applicant fulfils those requirements of Directive 2014/65/EU or those of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 in respect of which the applicant has requested an exemption in accordance with Article 6 of this Regulation.
Where, as referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article, a legal person simultaneously applies for authorisation as an investment firm or for authorisation to operate a regulated market, or for authorisation as a CSD, and for a specific permission, it shall submit in its application the information required under Article 7 of Directive 2014/65/EU or Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 respectively, except for information that would be necessary to demonstrate compliance with the requirements in respect of which the applicant has requested an exemption in accordance with Article 6 of this Regulation.
An application for a specific permission to operate a DLT TSS under this Regulation shall contain the following information:

(a)	the applicant’s business plan, the rules of the DLT TSS and any legal terms as referred to in Article 7(1), as well as information regarding the functioning, services and activities of the DLT TSS as referred to in Article 7(3);

(b)	a description of the functioning of the distributed ledger technology used, as referred to in Article 7(2);

(c)	a description of the applicant’s overall IT and cyber arrangements as referred to in Article 7(4);

(d)	evidence that the applicant has in place sufficient prudential safeguards to meet its liabilities and to compensate its clients, as referred to in Article 7(6), third subparagraph;

(e)	where applicable, a description of the safekeeping arrangements for clients’ DLT financial instruments as referred to in Article 7(5);

(f)	a description of the arrangements for ensuring investor protection and a description of the mechanisms for handling client complaints and redress, as referred to in Article 7(6), second subparagraph;

(g)	the applicant’s transition strategy; and

(h)	the exemptions that the applicant is requesting under Article 6, the justification for each exemption requested and any compensatory measures proposed and the means by which it intends to comply with the conditions attached to those exemptions.

In addition to the information referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article, an applicant that intends to operate a DLT TSS as an investment firm or market operator shall submit the information on how it intends to comply with the applicable requirements of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 as referred to in Article 6(1) of this Regulation, except for information that would be necessary to demonstrate compliance with requirements in respect of which the applicant has requested an exemption in accordance with that Article.

In addition to the information referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article, an applicant that intends to operate a DLT TSS as a CSD shall submit the information on how it intends to comply with the applicable requirements of Directive 2014/65/EU as referred to in Article 6(2) of this Regulation, except for information that would be necessary to demonstrate compliance with requirements in respect of which the applicant has requested an exemption in accordance with that Article.

By 23 March 2023, ESMA shall develop guidelines to establish standard forms, formats and templates for the purposes of paragraph 4.
Within 30 working days of the date of receipt of an application for a specific permission to operate a DLT TSS, the competent authority shall assess whether the application is complete. If the application is not complete, the competent authority shall set a time limit by which the applicant is to provide the missing or any additional information. The competent authority shall inform the applicant when the competent authority considers the application to be complete.

As soon as the competent authority considers the application to be complete, it shall send a copy of that application to:

(a)	ESMA; and

(b)	the relevant authorities specified in Article 12 of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014.

Where necessary to promote the consistency and proportionality of exemptions, or where necessary to ensure investor protection, market integrity and financial stability, ESMA shall provide the competent authority with a non-binding opinion on the exemptions requested or on the adequacy of the type of distributed ledger technology used for the purposes of this Regulation, within 30 calendar days of receiving a copy of that application.

Before issuing a non-binding opinion, ESMA shall consult the competent authorities of the other Member States and shall take the utmost account of their views when issuing its opinion.

The relevant authorities specified in Articles 12 of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 shall provide the competent authority with a non-binding opinion on the features of the DLT TSS operated by the applicant within 30 calendar days of receiving a copy of that application.

Within 90 working days of the date of receipt of a complete application for a specific permission to operate a DLT TSS, the competent authority shall carry out an assessment of the application and decide whether to grant the specific permission. Where the applicant applies simultaneously for authorisation under Directive 2014/65/EU or under Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 and for a specific permission under this Article, the assessment period may be extended for a further period up to that specified in Article 7(3) of Directive 2014/65/EU or Article 17(8) of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 respectively.
Without prejudice to Articles 7 and 44 of Directive 2014/65/EU and Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, the competent authority shall refuse to grant a specific permission to operate a DLT TSS if there are grounds for believing that:

(a)	there are significant risks to investor protection, market integrity or financial stability that are not properly addressed and mitigated by the applicant;

(b)	the specific permission to operate a DLT TSS and the exemptions requested are being sought for the purpose of circumventing legal or regulatory requirements; or

(c)	the operator of DLT TSS will not be able to comply, or will not allow its users to comply, with applicable provisions of Union law or provisions of national law falling outside the scope of Union Law.

A specific permission shall be valid throughout the Union for a period of up to six years from the date of issuance. The specific permission shall specify the exemptions that are granted in accordance with Article 6, any compensatory measures and any lower thresholds set by the competent authority in accordance with Article 3(6).

The competent authority shall inform ESMA and the relevant authorities specified in Article 12 of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the grant, refusal, or withdrawal of a specific permission under this Article without delay, including any information specified under the first subparagraph of this paragraph.

ESMA shall publish on its website:

(a)	the list of DLT TSSs, the start and end dates of their specific permissions, the list of exemptions granted to each of them, and any lower thresholds set by competent authorities for each of them; and

(b)	the total number of requests for exemptions that have been made under Article 6, indicating the number and types of exemptions granted or refused, together with the justifications for any refusals.

The information referred to in the third subparagraph, point (b), shall be published on an anonymous basis.

Without prejudice to Articles 8 and 44 of Directive 2014/65/EU and Article 20 of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, the competent authority shall withdraw a specific permission or any related exemptions where:

(a)	a flaw has been discovered in the functioning of the distributed ledger technology used, or in the services and activities provided by the operator of a DLT TSS that poses a risk to investor protection, market integrity or financial stability, and the risk outweighs the benefits of the services and activities under experimentation;

(b)	the operator of the DLT TSS has breached the conditions attached to the exemptions;

(c)	the operator of the DLT TSS has admitted to trading or recorded financial instruments that do not fulfil the conditions set out in Article 3(1);

(d)	the operator of the DLT TSS has exceeded the threshold referred to in Article 3(2);

(e)	the operator of the DLT TSS has exceeded the threshold referred to in Article 3(3) and has not activated the transition strategy; or

(f)	the operator of the DLT TSS obtained the specific permission or related exemptions on the basis of misleading information or a material omission.

Where an operator of a DLT TSS intends to introduce a material change to the functioning of the distributed ledger technology used, or to the services or activities of that operator, and that material change requires a new specific permission, a new exemption, or the modification of one or more of the operator’s existing exemptions or of any conditions attached to an exemption, the operator of the DLT TSS shall request a new specific permission, exemption or modification.

Where an operator of a DLT TSS requests a new specific permission, exemption or modification, the procedure set out in Article 6 shall apply. That request shall be processed by the competent authority in accordance with this Article.

art_11 #art_11

Article 11

Without prejudice to Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 and Directive 2014/65/EU, operators of DLT market infrastructures shall cooperate with the competent authorities.

In particular, operators of DLT market infrastructures shall notify their competent authorities upon becoming aware of any of the following matters, without delay:

(a)	any proposed material change to their business plan, including changes in relation to critical staff, the rules of the DLT market infrastructure and the legal terms;

(b)	any evidence of unauthorised access, material malfunctioning, loss, cyber-attacks or other cyber-threats, fraud, theft or other serious malpractice suffered by the operator of the DLT market infrastructure;

(c)	any material change to the information provided to the competent authority;

(d)	any technical or operational difficulties in performing the activities or providing the services that are subject to the specific permission, including difficulties related to the development or use of the distributed ledger technology and DLT financial instruments; or

(e)	any risks affecting investor protection, market integrity or financial stability that have arisen and that were not anticipated in the application requesting the specific permission or that were not anticipated at the time when the specific permission was granted.

Changes referred to in the second subparagraph, point (a) shall be notified at least four months before the change is planned, regardless of whether the proposed material change requires a change to the specific permission or related exemptions or conditions attached to those exemptions in accordance with Article 8, 9 or 10.

Where notified of the matters listed in the second subparagraph, points (a) to (e), the competent authority may require the operator of the DLT market infrastructure to make an application in accordance with Article 8(13), Article 9(13) or Article 10(13), or may require the operator of the DLT market infrastructure to take corrective measures as referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article.

The operator of the DLT market infrastructure shall provide the competent authority with any relevant information it requires.
The competent authority may require any corrective measures with respect to the business plan of the operator of the DLT market infrastructure, the rules of the DLT market infrastructure and the legal terms in order to ensure investor protection, market integrity or financial stability. The operator of the DLT market infrastructure shall report on the implementation of any corrective measures required by the competent authority in its reports as referred to in paragraph 4.
Every six months from the date of the specific permission, the operator of a DLT market infrastructure shall submit a report to the competent authority. That report shall include:

(a)	a summary of the information listed in paragraph 1, second subparagraph;

(b)	the number and value of DLT financial instruments admitted to trading on the DLT MTF or DLT TSS and the number and value of DLT financial instruments recorded by the operator of the DLT SS or DLT TSS;

(c)	the number and value of transactions traded on the DLT MTF or DLT TSS and settled by the operator of the DLT SS or DLT TSS;

(d)	a reasoned assessment of any difficulties in applying Union financial services legislation or national law; and

(e)	any actions taken to implement the conditions attached to the exemptions or to implement any compensatory or corrective measures required by the competent authority.

ESMA shall fulfil a coordination role with respect to competent authorities with a view to building a common understanding of distributed ledger technology and DLT market infrastructure, to establishing a common supervisory culture and the convergence of supervisory practices, and to ensuring consistent approaches and convergence in supervisory outcomes.

Competent authorities shall forward to ESMA the information and reports received from operators of DLT market infrastructures pursuant to paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 of this Article in a timely manner, and shall inform ESMA of any measures taken pursuant to paragraph 3 of this Article.

ESMA shall inform competent authorities on a regular basis of:

(a)	any reports submitted pursuant to paragraph 4 of this Article;

(b)	any specific permissions and exemptions granted under this Regulation as well as the conditions attached to those exemptions;

(c)	any refusal by a competent authority to grant a specific permission or exemption, any withdrawal of a specific permission or exemption and any cessations of business of a DLT market infrastructure.

ESMA shall monitor the application of specific permissions, and any related exemptions and conditions attached to those exemptions, as well as any compensatory or corrective measures required by competent authorities. ESMA shall submit an annual report to the Commission on how such specific permissions, exemptions, conditions and compensatory or corrective measures are applied in practice.

art_12 #art_12

Article 12

The competent authority for an investment firm operating a DLT MTF or DLT TSS shall be the competent authority designated by the Member State determined in accordance with Article 4(1), points (55)(a)(ii) and (iii), of Directive 2014/65/EU.
The competent authority for a market operator operating a DLT MTF or DLT TSS shall be the competent authority designated by the Member State in which the registered office of the market operator operating the DLT MTF or DLT TSS is situated or, if in accordance with the law of that Member State the market operator has no registered office, the Member State in which the head office of the market operator operating the DLT MTF or DLT TSS is situated.
The competent authority for a CSD operating a DLT SS or DLT TSS shall be the competent authority designated by the Member State determined in accordance with Article 2(1), point (23), of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014.

art_13 #art_13

Article 13

The Member States shall notify any competent authorities within the meaning of Article 2, point (21)(c), to ESMA and the Commission. ESMA shall publish a list of those competent authorities on its website.

art_14 #art_14

Article 14

By 24 March 2026, ESMA shall present a report to the Commission on:

(a)	the functioning of DLT market infrastructures throughout the Union;

(b)	the number of DLT market infrastructures;

(c)	the types of exemption requested by DLT market infrastructures and the types of exemption granted;

(d)	the number and value of DLT financial instruments that are admitted to trading and that are recorded on DLT market infrastructures;

(e)	the number and value of transactions traded or settled on DLT market infrastructures;

(f)	the types of distributed ledger technology used and technical issues related to the use of distributed ledger technology, including the matters listed in Article 11(1), second subparagraph, point (b), and on the impact of the use of distributed ledger technology on the climate policy objectives of the Union;

(g)	the procedures put in place by operators of DLT SSs or DLT TSSs in accordance with Article 5(3), point (b);

(h)

any risks, vulnerabilities or inefficiencies posed by the use of distributed ledger technology to investor protection, market integrity or financial stability, including any novel types of legal, systemic and operational risks, which are not sufficiently addressed by Union financial services legislation, and any other unintended effects on liquidity, volatility, investor protection, market integrity or financial stability;

(i)	any risks of regulatory arbitrage or issues affecting the level playing field between DLT market infrastructures under the pilot regime provided for in this Regulation and between DLT market infrastructures and other market infrastructures using legacy systems;

(j)	any issues relating to interoperability between DLT market infrastructures and other infrastructures using legacy systems;

(k)

any benefits and costs resulting from the use of a distributed ledger technology in terms of additional liquidity and financing for start-ups and small- and medium-sized enterprises, safety and efficiency improvements, energy consumption and risk mitigation throughout the entire trading and post-trading chain, including with regard to the recording and safekeeping of DLT financial instruments, the traceability of transactions and enhanced compliance with know-your-customer and anti-money laundering processes, corporate actions and direct exercise of investor rights by means of smart contracts, and reporting and supervisory functions at the level of the DLT market infrastructure;

(l)	any refusals to grant specific permissions or exemptions, any modifications or withdrawals of such specific permissions or exemptions as well as any compensatory or corrective measures;

(m)	any cessation of business by a DLT market infrastructure and the reasons for that cessation of business;

(n)	the appropriateness of the thresholds referred to in Article 3 and Article 5(8), including the potential implications resulting from an increase of those thresholds, taking into account, in particular, systemic considerations and different types of distributed ledger technology; and

(o)	an overall assessment of the costs and benefits of the pilot regime provided for in this Regulation and a recommendation whether, and under which conditions, to continue this pilot regime.

On the basis of the report referred to in paragraph 1, within three months of receipt of that report, the Commission shall present a report to the European Parliament and to the Council. That report shall include a cost-benefit analysis on whether the pilot regime provided for in this Regulation should be:

(a)	extended for a further period of up to three years;

(b)	extended to other types of financial instrument that can be issued, recorded, transferred or stored using a distributed ledger technology;

(c)	amended;

(d)	made permanent through appropriate amendments of the relevant Union financial services legislation; or

(e)	terminated, including all specific permissions granted under this Regulation.

In its report, the Commission may propose any appropriate amendment to Union financial services legislation or any harmonisation of national laws that would facilitate the use of distributed ledger technology in the financial sector, as well as any measures needed for the transition of DLT market infrastructures away from the pilot regime provided for in this Regulation.

In the event that this pilot regime is extended for a further period as provided for in the first subparagraph, point (a), of this paragraph, the Commission shall ask ESMA to submit an additional report in accordance with paragraph 1 no later than three months before the end of the extension period. Upon receipt of that report, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council an additional report in accordance with this paragraph.

art_15 #art_15

Article 15

ESMA shall publish annual interim reports in order to provide market participants with information on the functioning of the markets, to address incorrect behaviour of operators of DLT market infrastructures, to provide clarifications on the application of this Regulation and to update previous indications based on the evolution of distributed ledger technology. Those reports shall also provide an overall description of the application of the pilot regime provided for in this Regulation, focusing on trends and emerging risks, and shall be submitted to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission. The first such report shall be published by 24 March 2024.

art_16 #art_16

Article 16

In Article 54(2) of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:

‘If the Commission concludes that there is no need to exclude exchange-traded derivatives from the scope of Articles 35 and 36 in accordance with Article 52(12), a CCP or a trading venue may, before 22 June 2022, apply to its competent authority for permission to avail itself of transitional arrangements. The competent authority, taking into account the risks to the orderly functioning of the relevant CCP or trading venue resulting from the application of the access rights under Article 35 or 36 as regards exchange-traded derivatives, may decide that Article 35 or 36 does not apply to the relevant CCP or trading venue, respectively, in respect of exchange-traded derivatives, for a transitional period until 3 July 2023. Where the competent authority decides to approve such a transitional period, the CCP or trading venue shall not benefit from the access rights under Article 35 or 36 as regards exchange-traded derivatives for the duration of the transitional period. The competent authority shall notify ESMA and, in the case of a CCP, the college of competent authorities for that CCP, whenever it approves a transitional period.’.

art_17 #art_17

Article 17

In Article 76(5) of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:

‘Each of the settlement discipline measures referred to in Article 7(1) to (13) shall apply from the date of application specified for each settlement discipline measure in the delegated act adopted by the Commission pursuant to Article 7(15).’.

art_18 #art_18

Article 18

Directive 2014/65/EU is amended as follows:

(1)	in Article 4(1), point (15) is replaced by the following:‘(15)‘financial instrument’ means those instruments specified in Section C of Annex I, including such instruments issued by means of distributed ledger technology;’;
‘(15)	‘financial instrument’ means those instruments specified in Section C of Annex I, including such instruments issued by means of distributed ledger technology;’;

(2)

in Article 93, the following paragraph is inserted:‘3a. By 23 March 2023, Member States shall adopt and publish the provisions necessary to comply with point (15) of Article 4(1) and shall communicate them to the Commission. They shall apply those provisions from 23 March 2023.By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, Member States that cannot adopt provisions necessary to comply with point (15) of Article 4(1) by 23 March 2023, because their legislative procedures take more than nine months, shall benefit from an extension of a maximum of six months from 23 March 2023, provided that they notify the Commission of their need to make use of that extension by 23 March 2023.’.

art_19 #art_19

Article 19

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
It shall apply from 23 March 2023, except for:

(a)	Articles 8(5), 9(5), 10(6) and 17, which shall apply from 22 June 2022; and

(b)	Article 16, which shall apply from 4 July 2021.

Provenance and validity dates, identifier, hash

as of	2022-05-30 → this publisher state was selected
publisher state	publisher version 2022-05-30 → 2022-06-01 publisher-asserted
type	REG Regulation (EU) 2022/858 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2022 on a pilot regime for market infrastructures based on distributed ledger technology, and amending Regulations (EU) No 600/2014 and (EU) No 909/2014 and Directive 2014/65/EU (Text with EEA relevance)
language	en
published	2022-05-30
lex_id	eu-eurlex:32022r0858:2022-05-30--d6265db814a2eb4a6dd30ea7cd09dfac7865bbb7086aec7238cb96f595817f6d
record sha256	1d085fba1ce3b01421ca1b560e64a4e8e6bc3a9be05feaede69b3bc9af124c58

New here? What am I looking at?

This is an official consolidated text: the original act with later amendments merged by EUR-Lex for the date shown above.

The consolidation date is not an entry-into-force or application date. It identifies a publisher wording state. The authentic legal acts remain those published in the Official Journal; Lex preserves the consolidated wording, source and hashes as a reading and comparison aid.

Each displayed provision carries its own hash so you can verify that Lex served the indexed text unchanged, here is how.

timeline

tier	A, publisher-supplied consolidated wording-state dates
history begins	publisher
index built	2026-08-15T09:01:06Z · corpus e9c4df0981c855855a1a28218cf086ddeb5bb691
stamp signature	valid (ECDSA-P256)