Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/511 of 24 November 2022 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 575/2013
as it stood on 2022-11-24, permalink: /eu-eurlex/32023r0511/2022-11-24--fb70aeb5b0075080e7808a86d39620e31a7548e4cfabe834fd20b19291395284
Article 1
When applying the mandate-based approach in accordance with Article 132a(2) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, where the CIU’s mandate does not exclude that the underlying of a CIU’s derivative position constitutes an on- or off-balance sheet exposure, but the exposure value or, in the case of off-balance sheet exposures, the applicable percentage pursuant to Article 111 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, is unknown, institutions shall use the full notional amount of the derivative position as the exposure value for the calculation of the risk-weighted exposure amounts.
For the purposes of determining the exposure value as set out in paragraph 1, where the notional amount of the derivative positions is unknown, institutions shall use a conservative estimation based on the maximum notional amount of the derivatives allowed under a CIU’s mandate as the exposure value.
Article 2
- When calculating the exposure value of a netting set for counterparty credit risk in accordance with the approaches set out in Part 3, Title II, Chapter 6, Sections 3, 4 or 5, where relevant, of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, institutions shall apply the following:
| (a) | where the institution is not able to calculate the replacement cost of the netting set according to the relevant approach, due to missing inputs, that institution shall use the sum of notional amounts of all the derivatives in the netting set as the replacement cost; |
|---|
| (b) | where the institution is not able to calculate the potential future exposure of the netting set according to the relevant approach, due to missing inputs, that institution shall replace it by 0,15 times the sum of notional amounts of all the derivatives in the netting set. |
|---|
When calculating the exposure value for counterparty credit risk in accordance with paragraph 1, where the notional amount of the derivatives in the netting set is unknown, institutions shall use a conservative estimation based on the maximum notional amount of the derivatives allowed under a CIU’s mandate to determine the exposure value of that netting set.
For the purposes of paragraphs 1 and 2, where it is not possible for institutions to ascertain the relevant netting sets for a certain type of derivative in the CIU, they shall assume that the CIU has entered into a single derivative with the maximum notional amount permitted by the mandate for that type of derivative.
Article 3
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Provenance and validity dates, identifier, hash
| as of | 2022-11-24 → this publisher state was selected |
| publisher state | publisher version 2022-11-24 → latest held publisher-asserted |
| type | REG_DEL Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/511 of 24 November 2022 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts of collective investment undertakings under the mandate-based approach (Text with EEA relevance) |
| language | en |
| published | 2022-11-24 |
| lex_id | eu-eurlex:32023r0511:2022-11-24--fb70aeb5b0075080e7808a86d39620e31a7548e4cfabe834fd20b19291395284 |
| record sha256 | 646287f1b1b4188dc4c25d3f3475652f7da7f6b446fcf9986cf705faa79a861f |
New here? What am I looking at?
This is an official consolidated text: the original act with later amendments merged by EUR-Lex for the date shown above.
The consolidation date is not an entry-into-force or application date. It identifies a publisher wording state. The authentic legal acts remain those published in the Official Journal; Lex preserves the consolidated wording, source and hashes as a reading and comparison aid.
Each displayed provision carries its own hash so you can verify that Lex served the indexed text unchanged, here is how.
| tier | A, publisher-supplied consolidated wording-state dates |
| history begins | publisher |
| index built | 2026-08-15T09:01:06Z · corpus e9c4df0981c855855a1a28218cf086ddeb5bb691 |
| stamp signature | valid (ECDSA-P256) |