Règlement grand-ducal du 15 février 1984 octroyant une dénomination particulière au cinquième lycée technique de Luxembourg
as it stood on 2024-04-21, permalink: /lu-legilux/rgd-1984-02-15-n3/2024-04-21
Le cinquième lycée technique de Luxembourg prend la dénomination de « Bouneweger Lycée Luxembourg ».
Notre Ministre de l'Education Nationale est chargé de l'exécution du présent règlement, qui sera publié au Mémorial.
Provenance and validity dates, identifier, hash
| as of | 2024-04-21 → this version applied |
| valid | 2024-04-21 → open publisher-asserted |
| type | RGD Version consolidée applicable au 21/04/2024 : Règlement grand-ducal du 15 février 1984 octroyant une dénomination particulière au cinquième lycée technique de Luxembourg. |
| language | fr |
| published | 2024-04-22 |
| lex_id | lu-legilux:rgd-1984-02-15-n3:2024-04-21 |
| record sha256 | 9a1c72ca3b5229039c0fb78df4e96b703aff5ba612744d447a978660b677d766 |
New here? What am I looking at?
This is a consolidated text: the original law with every later amendment merged in, as the official publisher produced it for a given date. Laws are amended constantly, so “the law” has no single text, only a text per date. That date is the banner above.
It has no legal force. Only the version published in the official gazette (Mémorial / Official Journal) is authentic, the publishers say so themselves, and so do we. Lex reproduces their text without altering a byte, and links the source on every page. This is legal information, never legal advice: it reports what the text said, never what it means for your situation.
“Valid from → to” = the window in which this text applied. “Open” = still current as far as the publisher has consolidated. Each article carries its own hash so you can prove it was not tampered with , here is how.
| tier | A, publisher-supplied validity dates |
| history begins | publisher |
| index built | 2026-08-04T13:15:37Z · corpus 2f51cf1 |
| stamp signature | valid (ECDSA-P256) |