Commission Regulation (EU) No 1042/2012 of 7 November 2012 amending Regulation (EU) No 103…
as it stood on 2012-11-07, permalink: /eu-eurlex/32012r1042/2012-11-07
Article 1
Regulation (EU) No 1031/2010 is amended as follows:
| (1) | Article 25, paragraph 2 is amended as follows:(a)point (c) is replaced by the following:‘(c)any evidence of anti-competitive behaviour, market abuse, money laundering, terrorist financing or criminal activity;’;(b)point (f) is replaced by the following:‘(f)information about the number, nature and status of any complaints made pursuant to Articles 59(4) or 64(1) as well as any complaints made against an auction platform to the national competetent authorities supervising that auction platform, the courts or competent administrative bodies provided for in the national measures transposing Article 52(2) of Directive 2004/39/EC.’; |
|---|---|
| (a) | point (c) is replaced by the following:‘(c)any evidence of anti-competitive behaviour, market abuse, money laundering, terrorist financing or criminal activity;’; |
| ‘(c) | any evidence of anti-competitive behaviour, market abuse, money laundering, terrorist financing or criminal activity;’; |
| (b) | point (f) is replaced by the following:‘(f)information about the number, nature and status of any complaints made pursuant to Articles 59(4) or 64(1) as well as any complaints made against an auction platform to the national competetent authorities supervising that auction platform, the courts or competent administrative bodies provided for in the national measures transposing Article 52(2) of Directive 2004/39/EC.’; |
| ‘(f) | information about the number, nature and status of any complaints made pursuant to Articles 59(4) or 64(1) as well as any complaints made against an auction platform to the national competetent authorities supervising that auction platform, the courts or competent administrative bodies provided for in the national measures transposing Article 52(2) of Directive 2004/39/EC.’; |
| (2) | Annex III is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation. |
|---|
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Provenance and validity dates, identifier, hash
| as of | 2012-11-07 → this version applied |
| valid | 2012-11-07 → open publisher-asserted |
| type | REG_IMPL Commission Regulation (EU) No 1042/2012 of 7 November 2012 amending Regulation (EU) No 1031/2010 to list an auction platform to be appointed by the United Kingdom Text with EEA relevance |
| language | en |
| published | 2012-11-07 |
| lex_id | eu-eurlex:32012r1042:2012-11-07 |
| record sha256 | eac1d27dfbc4d74e8eaeaa3bfa4241d2d96d194dd4969e51539fa6541ec22fe9 |
New here? What am I looking at?
This is a consolidated text: the original law with every later amendment merged in, as the official publisher produced it for a given date. Laws are amended constantly, so “the law” has no single text, only a text per date. That date is the banner above.
It has no legal force. Only the version published in the official gazette (Mémorial / Official Journal) is authentic, the publishers say so themselves, and so do we. Lex reproduces their text without altering a byte, and links the source on every page. This is legal information, never legal advice: it reports what the text said, never what it means for your situation.
“Valid from → to” = the window in which this text applied. “Open” = still current as far as the publisher has consolidated. Each article carries its own hash so you can prove it was not tampered with , here is how.
timeline next version (2012-11-07) →
| tier | A, publisher-supplied validity dates |
| history begins | publisher |
| index built | 2026-08-07T19:46:23Z · corpus 8d5e859 |
| stamp signature | valid (ECDSA-P256) |