Corrigendum to Directive 2013/36/EU
as it stood on 2017-01-25, permalink: /eu-eurlex/32013l0036r(02)/2017-01-25
Outline, 1 provisions
25.1.2017 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 20/1 Corrigendum to Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC ( Official Journal of the European Union L 176 of 27 June 2013 ) On page 358, Article 22(4): for: ‘… not subject to supervision under this Directive or under Directives 2009/65/EC, 2009/138EC, or 2004/39/EC.’, read: ‘… not subject to supervision under this Directive or under Directive 2009/65/EC, 2009/138/EC, or 2004/39/EC.’; on page 375, Article 67(1), point (n): for: ‘… or in cases where Articles 28, 51 or 63 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 prohibit such payments to holders of instruments included in own funds;’, read: ‘… or in cases where Article 28, 52 or 63 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 prohibit such payments to holders of instruments included in own funds;’; on page 400, Article 117(4), first subparagraph, introductory wording: for: ‘… where such a decision are of importance for other competent authorities' supervisory tasks:’, read: ‘… where such a decision is of importance for other competent authorities' supervisory tasks:’; on page 408, Article 133(3): for: ‘3. For the purpose of paragraph 1, institutions may be required to maintain, in addition to the Common Equity Tier 1 capital maintained to meet the own funds requirement imposed by Article 92 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, ….’, read: ‘3. For the purpose of paragraph 1 of this Article, institutions may be required to maintain, in addition to the Common Equity Tier 1 capital maintained to meet the own funds requirements imposed by Article 92 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, ….’; on page 416, Article 142(1), second subparagraph: for: ‘Competent authorities shall grant such authorisations only on the basis of the individual situation of a credit institution ….’, read: ‘Competent authorities shall grant such authorisations only on the basis of the individual situation of an institution ….’; on page 421, Article 158(5), first sentence: for: ‘5. … the competent authorities … shall establish and chair a college of supervisors to facilitate … the exchange of information under Article 60.’, read: ‘5. … the competent authorities … shall establish and chair a college of supervisors to facilitate … the exchange of information under Article 50.’.
Provenance and validity dates, identifier, hash
| as of | 2017-01-25 → this version applied |
| valid | 2017-01-25 → open publisher-asserted |
| type | CORRIGENDUM Corrigendum to Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC (OJ L 176, 27.6.2013) |
| language | en |
| published | 2017-01-25 |
| lex_id | eu-eurlex:32013l0036r(02):2017-01-25 |
| record sha256 | 9075bbf617b6655567e746629638d1b4d63ec767dc2e27e633e3594309d97222 |
New here? What am I looking at?
This is a consolidated text: the original law with every later amendment merged in, as the official publisher produced it for a given date. Laws are amended constantly, so “the law” has no single text, only a text per date. That date is the banner above.
It has no legal force. Only the version published in the official gazette (Mémorial / Official Journal) is authentic, the publishers say so themselves, and so do we. Lex reproduces their text without altering a byte, and links the source on every page. This is legal information, never legal advice: it reports what the text said, never what it means for your situation.
“Valid from → to” = the window in which this text applied. “Open” = still current as far as the publisher has consolidated. Each article carries its own hash so you can prove it was not tampered with , here is how.
timeline next version (2017-01-25) →
| tier | A, publisher-supplied validity dates |
| history begins | publisher |
| index built | 2026-08-07T19:46:23Z · corpus 8d5e859 |
| stamp signature | valid (ECDSA-P256) |