Corrigendum to Directive 2014/65/EU
as it stood on 2016-10-08, permalink: /eu-eurlex/32014l0065r(07)/2016-10-08
Outline, 1 provisions
8.10.2016 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 273/35 Corrigendum to Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU ( Official Journal of the European Union L 173 of 12 June 2014 ) On page 447, Article 61(5): for: ‘5. ESMA shall develop draft implementing technical standards to determine standard forms, templates and procedures for the notification or provision of information provided for in paragraph 2 of this Article and in Article 63(4).’, read: ‘5. ESMA shall develop draft implementing technical standards to determine standard forms, templates and procedures for the notification or provision of information provided for in paragraph 2 of this Article and in Article 63(3).’.
Provenance and validity dates, identifier, hash
| as of | 2016-10-08 → this version applied |
| valid | 2016-10-08 → open publisher-asserted |
| type | CORRIGENDUM Corrigendum to Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU (OJ L 173, 12.6.2014) |
| language | en |
| published | 2016-10-08 |
| lex_id | eu-eurlex:32014l0065r(07):2016-10-08 |
| record sha256 | 96c6f7b055648f95c4824d89b0f963f217dfe9552eabcf5f1d66e2cf540d77fa |
New here? What am I looking at?
This is a consolidated text: the original law with every later amendment merged in, as the official publisher produced it for a given date. Laws are amended constantly, so “the law” has no single text, only a text per date. That date is the banner above.
It has no legal force. Only the version published in the official gazette (Mémorial / Official Journal) is authentic, the publishers say so themselves, and so do we. Lex reproduces their text without altering a byte, and links the source on every page. This is legal information, never legal advice: it reports what the text said, never what it means for your situation.
“Valid from → to” = the window in which this text applied. “Open” = still current as far as the publisher has consolidated. Each article carries its own hash so you can prove it was not tampered with , here is how.
timeline next version (2016-10-08) →
| tier | A, publisher-supplied validity dates |
| history begins | publisher |
| index built | 2026-08-07T19:46:23Z · corpus 8d5e859 |
| stamp signature | valid (ECDSA-P256) |