Corrigendum to Directive (EU) 2018/957
as it stood on 2019-03-29, permalink: /eu-eurlex/32018l0957r(01)/2019-03-29
Outline, 1 provisions
29.3.2019 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 91/77 Corrigendum to Directive (EU) 2018/957 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 June 2018 amending Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services ( Official Journal of the European Union L 173 of 9 July 2018 ) On page 22, Article 1, point (2)(c), second subparagraph, second sentence: for: ‘The employer shall, without prejudice to point (h) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 1, reimburse the posted worker for such expenditure in accordance with the national law and/or practice applicable to the employment relationship.’, read: ‘The employer shall, without prejudice to point (i) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 1, reimburse the posted worker for such expenditure in accordance with the national law and/or practice applicable to the employment relationship.’.
Provenance and validity dates, identifier, hash
| as of | 2019-03-29 → this version applied |
| valid | 2019-03-29 → open publisher-asserted |
| type | DIR Corrigendum to Directive (EU) 2018/957 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 June 2018 amending Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services (OJ L 173, 9.7.2018) |
| language | en |
| published | 2019-03-29 |
| lex_id | eu-eurlex:32018l0957r(01):2019-03-29 |
| record sha256 | 12dca844ac788117f936fb266941db0ad00c66045e35b6d0477857dd49892cce |
New here? What am I looking at?
This is a consolidated text: the original law with every later amendment merged in, as the official publisher produced it for a given date. Laws are amended constantly, so “the law” has no single text, only a text per date. That date is the banner above.
It has no legal force. Only the version published in the official gazette (Mémorial / Official Journal) is authentic, the publishers say so themselves, and so do we. Lex reproduces their text without altering a byte, and links the source on every page. This is legal information, never legal advice: it reports what the text said, never what it means for your situation.
“Valid from → to” = the window in which this text applied. “Open” = still current as far as the publisher has consolidated. Each article carries its own hash so you can prove it was not tampered with , here is how.
timeline next version (2019-03-29) →
| tier | A, publisher-supplied validity dates |
| history begins | publisher |
| index built | 2026-08-07T19:46:23Z · corpus 8d5e859 |
| stamp signature | valid (ECDSA-P256) |