Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/511 of 24 November 2022 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 575/2013

as it stood on 2022-11-24, permalink: /eu-eurlex/32023r0511/2022-11-24

Point-in-time view as at 2022-11-24. This version has been superseded, it applied 2022-11-24 → open. Jump to the version in force today or see exactly what changed next.

Text included, per-article reading view. Deterministic extraction of the verbatim retrieved document; each article carries its own hash and anchor. © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse permitted with attribution under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU. Consolidated texts have no legal effect; only acts published in the Official Journal are authentic.

Outline, 3 provisions

art_1 art_2 art_3

art_1 #art_1

Article 1

When applying the mandate-based approach in accordance with Article 132a(2) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, where the CIU’s mandate does not exclude that the underlying of a CIU’s derivative position constitutes an on- or off-balance sheet exposure, but the exposure value or, in the case of off-balance sheet exposures, the applicable percentage pursuant to Article 111 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, is unknown, institutions shall use the full notional amount of the derivative position as the exposure value for the calculation of the risk-weighted exposure amounts.
For the purposes of determining the exposure value as set out in paragraph 1, where the notional amount of the derivative positions is unknown, institutions shall use a conservative estimation based on the maximum notional amount of the derivatives allowed under a CIU’s mandate as the exposure value.

art_2 #art_2

Article 2

When calculating the exposure value of a netting set for counterparty credit risk in accordance with the approaches set out in Part 3, Title II, Chapter 6, Sections 3, 4 or 5, where relevant, of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, institutions shall apply the following:

(a)	where the institution is not able to calculate the replacement cost of the netting set according to the relevant approach, due to missing inputs, that institution shall use the sum of notional amounts of all the derivatives in the netting set as the replacement cost;

(b)	where the institution is not able to calculate the potential future exposure of the netting set according to the relevant approach, due to missing inputs, that institution shall replace it by 0,15 times the sum of notional amounts of all the derivatives in the netting set.

When calculating the exposure value for counterparty credit risk in accordance with paragraph 1, where the notional amount of the derivatives in the netting set is unknown, institutions shall use a conservative estimation based on the maximum notional amount of the derivatives allowed under a CIU’s mandate to determine the exposure value of that netting set.
For the purposes of paragraphs 1 and 2, where it is not possible for institutions to ascertain the relevant netting sets for a certain type of derivative in the CIU, they shall assume that the CIU has entered into a single derivative with the maximum notional amount permitted by the mandate for that type of derivative.

art_3 #art_3

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Provenance and validity dates, identifier, hash

as of	2022-11-24 → this version applied
valid	2022-11-24 → open publisher-asserted
type	REG_DEL Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/511 of 24 November 2022 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts of collective investment undertakings under the mandate-based approach (Text with EEA relevance)
language	en
published	2022-11-24
lex_id	eu-eurlex:32023r0511:2022-11-24
record sha256	1904ea7f5cbbcebd142dd0d56195654e069cb117b482f7bf6446411293bb6da7

New here? What am I looking at?

This is a consolidated text: the original law with every later amendment merged in, as the official publisher produced it for a given date. Laws are amended constantly, so “the law” has no single text, only a text per date. That date is the banner above.

It has no legal force. Only the version published in the official gazette (Mémorial / Official Journal) is authentic, the publishers say so themselves, and so do we. Lex reproduces their text without altering a byte, and links the source on every page. This is legal information, never legal advice: it reports what the text said, never what it means for your situation.

“Valid from → to” = the window in which this text applied. “Open” = still current as far as the publisher has consolidated. Each article carries its own hash so you can prove it was not tampered with , here is how.

timeline next version (2022-11-24) →

tier	A, publisher-supplied validity dates
history begins	publisher
index built	2026-08-07T19:46:23Z · corpus 8d5e859
stamp signature	valid (ECDSA-P256)