Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1288 of 12 June 2026 on the stand-alone suspension of the trading obligation for derivatives in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 600/2014

as it stood on 2026-06-12, permalink: /eu-eurlex/32026r1288/2026-06-12

Point-in-time view as at 2026-06-12. This version has been superseded, it applied 2026-06-12 → open. Jump to the version in force today or see exactly what changed next.

Text included, per-article reading view. Deterministic extraction of the verbatim retrieved document; each article carries its own hash and anchor. © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse permitted with attribution under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU. Consolidated texts have no legal effect; only acts published in the Official Journal are authentic.

Outline, 3 provisions

art_1 art_2 art_3

art_1 #art_1

Article 1

For the purposes of Article 32a(1), point (a), of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014, in view of the evidence presented in Section 1 of the Annex to this Regulation, the derivative trading obligation is suspended with respect to the following financial counterparties and the following specific market:

(a)	financial counterparties:(i)BNP Paribas SA;(ii)Crédit Agricole CIB;(iii)Deutsche Bank AG;(iv)Société Générale SA;
(i)	BNP Paribas SA;
(ii)	Crédit Agricole CIB;
(iii)	Deutsche Bank AG;
(iv)	Société Générale SA;

(b)	specific market:United Kingdom.

For the purposes of Article 32a(1), point (b), of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014, in view of the evidence presented in Section 2 of the Annex to this Regulation, the derivative trading obligation is suspended with respect to the following financial counterparty and the following specific market:

(a)	financial counterparty:BNP Paribas SA;

(b)	specific market:United Kingdom.

art_2 #art_2

Article 2

The Commission shall review whether the grounds for the suspension of the derivative trading obligation continue to apply every five years from 18 June 2026.

For the purposes of carrying out the review referred to in the first subparagraph, the competent authorities of the financial counterparties referred to in Article 1 shall provide the Commission with updated evidence on the grounds for the suspension of the derivative trading obligation at the latest six months before the date by which the Commission is to carry out that review.

Without prejudice to paragraph 1 of this Article, where the competent authorities of the financial counterparties referred to in Article 1 deem that the conditions set out in Article 32a(1), points (a) or (b), of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 are no longer complied with, they shall notify the Commission without undue delay.

For the purposes of the first subparagraph, the competent authorities shall regularly monitor the compliance of the financial counterparties referred to in Article 1 of this Regulation with the conditions set out in Article 32a(1), points (a) or (b), of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014.

Following the review carried out in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, or following the notification by a competent authority pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article, or after having otherwise obtained knowledge that a financial counterparty referred to in Article 1 no longer satisfies the grounds for the suspension of the derivative trading obligation, the Commission may revoke the suspension of the derivative trading obligation with respect to that financial counterparty.
Before revoking the suspension of the derivative trading obligation pursuant to paragraph 3, the Commission shall notify the competent authority of the financial counterparty concerned of its intention to revoke the suspension of the derivative trading obligation and the reasons thereof. Within six weeks from the date of the notification, the competent authority of the financial counterparty concerned may submit to the Commission a reasoned statement with any relevant information for the purposes of assessing the grounds for the suspension of the derivative trading obligation.

art_3 #art_3

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Provenance and validity dates, identifier, hash

as of	2026-06-12 → this version applied
valid	2026-06-12 → open publisher-asserted
type	REG_IMPL Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1288 of 12 June 2026 on the stand-alone suspension of the trading obligation for derivatives in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council
language	en
published	2026-06-12
lex_id	eu-eurlex:32026r1288:2026-06-12
record sha256	e3c204f081e490bae7db3c09ee655a89e788507ba8649dbdd9112f2ae9e304fb

New here? What am I looking at?

This is a consolidated text: the original law with every later amendment merged in, as the official publisher produced it for a given date. Laws are amended constantly, so “the law” has no single text, only a text per date. That date is the banner above.

It has no legal force. Only the version published in the official gazette (Mémorial / Official Journal) is authentic, the publishers say so themselves, and so do we. Lex reproduces their text without altering a byte, and links the source on every page. This is legal information, never legal advice: it reports what the text said, never what it means for your situation.

“Valid from → to” = the window in which this text applied. “Open” = still current as far as the publisher has consolidated. Each article carries its own hash so you can prove it was not tampered with , here is how.

timeline next version (2026-06-12) →

tier	A, publisher-supplied validity dates
history begins	publisher
index built	2026-08-07T19:46:23Z · corpus 8d5e859
stamp signature	valid (ECDSA-P256)