Code communal\n\nCETTE VERSION NE CONTIENT PAS ENCORE LES MODIFICATIONS RÉTROACTIVES INTRODUITES PAR LE RGD du 2 AVRIL 2026\nPUBLIÉ AU MÉMORIAL A - 201 DU 15 AVRIL 2026
as it stood on 2026-01-01, permalink: /lu-legilux/code-communal/2026-01-01
62 versions · click any mark to read the law as it stood that day · ▌ the one you are reading
| as of | 2026-01-01 → this version applied |
| valid | 2026-01-01 → open publisher-asserted |
| type | CODE_RECUEIL Code communal\n\nCETTE VERSION NE CONTIENT PAS ENCORE LES MODIFICATIONS RÉTROACTIVES INTRODUITES PAR LE RGD du 2 AVRIL 2026\nPUBLIÉ AU MÉMORIAL A - 201 DU 15 AVRIL 2026. |
| language | fr |
| published | 2026-01-15 |
| lex_id | lu-legilux:code-communal:2026-01-01 |
| record sha256 | 930d3d436138f1d356febc70478acf51fcf37900f3b284db313ef82899daa9ef |
New here? What am I looking at?
This is a consolidated text: the original law with every later amendment merged in, as the official publisher produced it for a given date. Laws are amended constantly, so “the law” has no single text, only a text per date. That date is the banner above.
It has no legal force. Only the version published in the official gazette (Mémorial / Official Journal) is authentic, the publishers say so themselves, and so do we. Lex reproduces their text without altering a byte, and links the source on every page. This is legal information, never legal advice: it reports what the text said, never what it means for your situation.
“Valid from → to” = the window in which this text applied. “Open” = still current as far as the publisher has consolidated. Each article carries its own hash so you can prove it was not tampered with , here is how.
← previous version (2025-12-01) timeline
| tier | A, publisher-supplied validity dates |
| history begins | publisher |
| index built | 2026-08-04T13:15:37Z · corpus 2f51cf1 |
| stamp signature | valid (ECDSA-P256) |