Reading
The text on a date
The text of one Luxembourg work as it stood on one date, or of one EU work in the wording that answers that date (its original wording or a later consolidated one), article by article, as the publisher wrote it, with what a quotation of it needs. The identifier and the date go to this server in the request and nowhere else, and this page keeps nothing.
Lex shows the published text of the law. It does not tell you whether or how it applies to your situation and is not legal advice.
Text served under agreed_cc_by_rederived. Read on 2026-10-31 in fra.
As published; may have been amended since; no consolidated text.
Later versions: not held.
This text was extracted and normalised by Lex, for information; it is not authentic. For an act published before 1 January 2017, the printed Mémorial is authentic, and the publisher's PDF is its digital reproduction. The act as published: http://data.legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/1972/07/03/n1/jo.
loi-1972-07-03-n1, fra, the act as published, dated by its entry into force on 1972-08-16 (publisher)
1 article quoted, 0 held without text, 0 not admitted; 0 with their own date differing from the state's.
article_unique
Article unique.Est approuvée la Convention unique sur les stupéfiants, fait à New York, le 30 mars 1961.
Text digest
420651e7c81fb6535442e6a7f221978da2136feb73bfdde0ccb610d322fc45b7, body digestedcf7e6133c6fd93a92faa0b587824129150f5b12e13a85bb9e68ccee7ada898, official sourcehttp://data.legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/1972/07/03/n1/jo,/lu-legilux/loi-1972-07-03-n1/1972-08-16--0597673b603e398928edd8cefe98114c300b5be386062579b2810297fed564c2/fra/article_unique
What this reading does not hold
- publisher_signature: no signature or attestation of the publisher is held; the digests are this index's own reading of the retained bytes under the named rule profiles
- observation_time: when the publisher served the retained bytes is not held, so no observation time is stated
- export_formats: PDF, JSON and CSV exports are the export composer's, not this answer's; this answer is the evidence they compose from
- notes_in_wording_digest: wording_sha256 covers the article's text and reference tokens only; the notes travel beside it and are covered by text_sha256 only through the text they were attached to
- later_versions: later versions of this act are not held